From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760808AbXGRJJx (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:09:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754994AbXGRJJp (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:09:45 -0400 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:4710 "EHLO mail.muc.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753591AbXGRJJo (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:09:44 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 400 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2007 05:09:44 EDT Date: 18 Jul 2007 11:03:02 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:03:02 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Rusty Russell Cc: lkml - Kernel Mailing List , kvm-devel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386. Message-ID: <20070718090302.GA67073@muc.de> References: <1184743355.10380.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1184743355.10380.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:22:34PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > However, the currently (i386-derived) x86-64 ones are suboptimal. The In what way are they suboptimal? They seem to work just fine. -Andi From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Standardize x86_64's desc_defs.h in preparation for exposure to i386. Date: 18 Jul 2007 11:03:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20070718090302.GA67073@muc.de> References: <1184743355.10380.112.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel , Andrew Morton , lkml - Kernel Mailing List To: Rusty Russell Return-path: Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 11:03:02 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1184743355.10380.112.camel-bi+AKbBUZKY6gyzm1THtWbp2dZbC/Bob@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 05:22:34PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > However, the currently (i386-derived) x86-64 ones are suboptimal. The In what way are they suboptimal? They seem to work just fine. -Andi ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/