From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761806AbXGRNAq (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:00:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753104AbXGRNAh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:00:37 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:54672 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754491AbXGRNAg (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:00:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 14:59:37 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Roman Zippel , Linus Torvalds , James Bruce , Thomas Gleixner , Mike Galbraith , Andrea Arcangeli , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Arjan van de Ven , Chris Wright Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table Message-ID: <20070718125937.GA4099@elte.hu> References: <1184355835.12353.321.camel@chaos> <469B0D9E.3030402@andrew.cmu.edu> <20070716070610.GA10907@elte.hu> <20070716112037.GA6895@elte.hu> <1184754430.20032.130.camel@twins> <1184763148.20032.135.camel@twins> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1184763148.20032.135.camel@twins> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7-deb -1.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 14:45 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > I actually like the extra range, it allows for a much softer punch of > > > background tasks even on somewhat slower boxen. > > > > The extra range is not really a problem, in > > > > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0707.2/0850.html > > > > I suggested how we can have both. > > By breaking the UNIX model of nice levels. Not an option in my book. yeah, that's pretty much out of question. Ingo