From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939920AbXGSSKn (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:10:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759474AbXGSSKd (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:10:33 -0400 Received: from e36.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.154]:58077 "EHLO e36.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760006AbXGSSKb (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:10:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:10:29 -0500 From: "Serge E. Hallyn" To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Christian Ehrhardt , Andrew Morton , James Morris , Chris Wright , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Smalley Subject: Re: [PATCH try #3] security: Convert LSM into a static interface Message-ID: <20070719181029.GA3503@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> References: <20070718183503.541026f8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070719073948.GI18840@lisa.in-ulm.de> <20070719122424.GA5186@vino.hallyn.com> <1184864070.2694.3.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <20070719171913.GA1275@sergelap.austin.ibm.com> <1184868021.2694.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1184868021.2694.6.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Quoting Arjan van de Ven (arjan@infradead.org): > > > > > :) > > > > Actually, given that when lsm was being introduced, lsm seemed to > > improve performance overall, have you taken any measurements to show > > that this is actually the case? Of course it makes sense that it would, > > but witjout measurements we do not know. > > SuSE did a bunch of measurement I think a year ago and they showed a > several percent performance increase with a hack similar to the proposed > next step.. Very good. -serge