All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Jacob <jacob@internet24.de>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: even hash tables sizes, FAQ entry
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:41:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070720074134.GB17809@internet24.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0707191712150.23721@qynat.qvtvafvgr.pbz>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 479 bytes --]

On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 05:13:11PM -0700, David Lang wrote:
[..]
> >Is this still true? What is the reason for this? And: Does
> >any odd hashtable size work as well as other odd hash tables sizes
> >in the same order of magnitude?
> 
> changing conntrack_max is not chaning the hash bucket count, that change 
> can only be done in the code or as a module parameter at module load time.

Sure, I meant odd hash bucket counts of course, so is this
FAQ still accurate?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-20  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-19 22:17 need advice for high traffic network Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 22:17 ` David Lang
2007-07-19 22:40   ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 22:59     ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 23:17       ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 23:28         ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 23:35           ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 23:44             ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-20  0:18               ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-20  7:48                 ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-20 17:51                   ` David Lang
2007-07-20 23:14                     ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 23:47             ` even hash tables sizes, FAQ entry Thomas Jacob
2007-07-20  0:13               ` David Lang
2007-07-20  7:41                 ` Thomas Jacob [this message]
2007-07-20 17:44                   ` David Lang
2007-07-20 17:50                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-20 18:08                       ` David Lang
2007-07-21  3:44                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-08-06 18:50             ` need advice for high traffic network R. DuFresne
2007-07-19 22:49 ` Thomas Jacob
2007-07-19 22:53   ` Konstantin Svist
2007-07-19 23:16     ` David Lang
2007-07-20 14:16 ` Gregory Carter
     [not found] <200707202319.l6KNJMwx014487@mail3.jubileegroup.co.uk>
2007-07-21  6:41 ` even hash tables sizes, FAQ entry G.W. Haywood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070720074134.GB17809@internet24.de \
    --to=jacob@internet24.de \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.