From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936743AbXGTVmR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:42:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758136AbXGTVmA (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:42:00 -0400 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:40014 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753523AbXGTVl7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 17:41:59 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Ken Moffat Subject: Re: [RFC] what should 'uptime' be on suspend? Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:49:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Randy Dunlap , Bill Davidsen , Linux Kernel M/L References: <46A0210E.6010207@tmr.com> <20070720104215.476f4cc1.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070720175730.GB21550@deepthought> In-Reply-To: <20070720175730.GB21550@deepthought> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200707202349.54571.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday, 20 July 2007 19:57, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:42:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > man uptime: > > uptime - tell how long the system has been running > > > > I claim that the system is not running when it is suspended, > > so the suspension time should not be included in uptime. > > > So, maybe I shouldn't have put corrected in inverted commas, > because this was a real correction and my previous usage was an > unintended side-effect of an error. > > Anyway, the current behaviour is known and I guess any attempt to > change it (e.g. to what Bill was expecting) won't be well received. I agree. Greetings, Rafael -- "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." - Donald Knuth