Re: [PATCH] USB: driver for CM109 chipset

[Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 03:14:14PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On 7/12/07, Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz> wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:22:10PM -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> >> >> Hmm, they use KEY_0 through KEY_9 now.
> >> >
> >> >Which results in the phone sending 'é+ěščřžýáí' instead of
> >> >'0123456789'
> >> >on a Czech keyboard, which is definitely not what's intended. Similarly
> >> >for many other European keyboards.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hmm, I uttely confused. Why when atkbd emits KEY_0 it you get 0 in the
> >> shell (don't you?) but different result with phone keypad?
> >
> >No, on a Czech keyboard you don't. You press KEY_0, you get 'é'. The
> >French layout gives sililar results. (For '0' you need to press
> >KEY_SHIFT KEY_0.)
> 
> Oh, I completely forgot that there are keyboards that have numbers on
> upper register. I think I used such keymap on Yamaha MSX2 in high
> school... 20 years ago..?
> 
> But the keypad only works wif you have NumLock on right?

Yes. But the remote doesn't have a NumLock LED or key, right? Then, if
X had per-device lockstate, there wouldn't be a problem. But I fear the
lockstate and shiftstate is completely shared, like on the console.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs