All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Hazelton <dhazelton@enter.net>
To: Bartek <poemann@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	"Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pata support for IDE Controller 82801G ICH7 in Linux 2.6.22
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:12:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707221812.18286.dhazelton@enter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19061b0b0707221503mc18ae4ese658748a1f499e5c@mail.gmail.com>

On Sunday 22 July 2007 18:03:06 Bartek wrote:
> 2007/7/22, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
> > > > 00:1f.1 0101: 8086:27df (rev 02)
> > >
> > > Ok, this controller is supported.
> > > Did you forgot about CONFIG_PATA_MPIIX=y?
> >
> > MPIIX is for early Intel laptop (pentium era).
> >
> > If the chip is in AHCI mode then CONFIG_AHCI may be what is missing
>
> I made a few tests. First I booted my comp with Ubuntu Live Feisty
> Fawn, checked modules which are loaded, and interesting ones are:
> ata_piix, ata_generic, libata, scsi_mod, sg, sr_mod, sd_mod
> ls /dev/sda* showed:
> /dev/sda{1,2,3,4}.
> So I recompiled the kernel with these options (marking all these
> drivers as a modules, in the previous situation they were modules, as
> well as compiled directly), and tried to boot. Nothing worked. The
> same situation appeared: Waiting for root file system...
> Second, I installed a Debian distribution kernel
> (linux-image-2.6.22-1-686) and booted from it. It used an old IDE
> driver, not PATA. So again no success.
> According to AHCI, my chip is rather not that kind. Ubuntu does not
> load any AHCI modul. In my previous kernel compilations I tried that
> option as well. It did not work.

This sounds like a problem I ran into when I tried to boot a 2.6.21 kernel 
using libata with Ubuntu Edgy installed. The init script on the initramfs 
failed at the same point - not a problem with the drivers, but a problem with 
what the scripts are looking for. I'd suggest looking at the scripts on the 
initramfs - its been my experience that they are the culprit and not the 
kernel itself.

DRH

-- 
Dialup is like pissing through a pipette. Slow and excruciatingly painful.

      reply	other threads:[~2007-07-22 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-22  9:59 Pata support for IDE Controller 82801G ICH7 in Linux 2.6.22 Bartek
     [not found] ` <6bffcb0e0707220311v5b145050hbd911e37b6f14c80@mail.gmail.com>
2007-07-22 17:21   ` Bartek
2007-07-22 18:55     ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-22 20:19       ` Bartek
2007-07-22 20:38       ` Alan Cox
2007-07-22 22:03         ` Bartek
2007-07-22 22:12           ` Daniel Hazelton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200707221812.18286.dhazelton@enter.net \
    --to=dhazelton@enter.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=poemann@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.