From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 20:58:56 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCh 4/4] Speed up sensors_get_ignored() Message-Id: <20070722225856.03cff25b@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <20070722165337.20c91514@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20070722165337.20c91514@hyperion.delvare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:09:28 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Jean Delvare wrote: > > Now that sensors_get_ignored() is an internal function, we can change > > its prototype to suit our needs better. > > > > * Pass the chip name by address. > > * Pass the feature directly rather than its number. > > * Switch to a sane convention for the returned value. > > * Don't check for errors that can't happen. > > > > --- > > lib/access.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------- > > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > And once more the patch looks good. > (...) > Let me know when this all lands, then I'll run another round of tests. I plan to merge all 4 patches on Tuesday (July 24th) morning, unless someone has objections until then. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors