All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.23-rc1] dma_free_coherent() needs irqs enabled (sigh)
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:07:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070724220738.GD22165@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707241429.05615.david-b@pacbell.net>

On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 02:29:05PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On at least ARM (and I'm told MIPS too) dma_free_coherent() has a newish
> call context requirement:  unlike its dma_alloc_coherent() sibling, it
> may not be called with IRQs disabled.  (This was new behavior on ARM as
> of late 2006, caused by ARM SMP updates.)

I think you got the year wrong:

5edf71ae (Russell King      2005-11-25 15:52:51 +0000 364)      WARN_ON(irqs_disabled());

which is due to this commit:

[ARM] Do not call flush_tlb_kernel_range() with IRQs disabled.

We must not call TLB maintainence operations with interrupts disabled,
otherwise we risk a lockup in the SMP IPI code.

This means that consistent_free() can not be called from a context with
IRQs disabled.  In addition, we must not hold the lock in consistent_free
when we call flush_tlb_kernel_range().  However, we must continue to
prevent consistent_alloc() from re-using the memory region until we've
finished tearing down the mapping and dealing with the TLB.

Therefore, leave the vm_region entry in the list, but mark it inactive
before dropping the lock and starting the tear-down process.  After the
mapping has been torn down, re-acquire the lock and remove the entry
from the list.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

> Since it looks like that restriction won't be removed, this patch changes
> the definition of the API to include that requirement.

The PCI DMA-mapping API had this restriction.  For some reason, this
restriction was not carried forward into the DMA-API.  Unfortunately
the restriction can not be removed without causing the problems
described in the commit which introduced it.

Or alternatively we scrap ARM SMP entirely, which isn't going to happen.

-- 
Russell King
 Linux kernel    2.6 ARM Linux   - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
 maintainer of:

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-24 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-24 21:29 [patch 2.6.23-rc1] dma_free_coherent() needs irqs enabled (sigh) David Brownell
2007-07-24 22:07 ` Russell King [this message]
2007-07-24 23:08   ` David Brownell
2007-07-24 23:11     ` Russell King
2007-07-25  0:35       ` David Brownell
2007-07-25 10:46 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-25 17:18   ` [PATCH] firewire: fw-ohci: dma_free_coherent needs IRQs enabled Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070724220738.GD22165@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.