From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH 23/24] advansys: Improve interrupt handler Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:53:36 -0600 Message-ID: <20070727145336.GK21219@parisc-linux.org> References: <20070727134038.GC21219@parisc-linux.org> <11855437542538-git-send-email-matthew@wil.cx> <46AA05ED.2060208@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:51795 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933603AbXG0Oxh (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:53:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46AA05ED.2060208@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 10:49:17AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Matthew Wilcox wrote: > >Pass the Scsi_Host to the interrupt handler, rather than polling all > >hosts for each interrupt. > >Return IRQ_NONE if we didn't handle this interrupt > >Don't set the IRQF_DISABLED flag; this is not a fast-executing interrupt > >handler. > > > >Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox > > hrm. > > I thought you had multiple scsi hosts per board? Thus multiple scsi > hosts per interrupt? Right. We'll request the interrupt twice, each time with a different scsi_host. -- "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."