From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933130AbXG2Rlc (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:41:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1764507AbXG2RlZ (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:41:25 -0400 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:37345 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764491AbXG2RlY (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 13:41:24 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 19:42:39 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Martin Steigerwald Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, Linus Torvalds , Jan Engelhardt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lkml@metanurb.dk Subject: Re: [ck] Re: Linus 2.6.23-rc1 Message-ID: <20070729174239.GA20399@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <200707291104.39945.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20070729102853.GA17701@uranus.ravnborg.org> <200707291256.32769.Martin@lichtvoll.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200707291256.32769.Martin@lichtvoll.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 12:56:28PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Sonntag 29 Juli 2007 schrieb Sam Ravnborg: > > > I > > > actually also think that the communication between Ingo and Con could > > > have been better especially when Ingo decided to write CFS while Con > > > was still working hard on SD. > > > > You realize that Ingo posted his code for anyone to look at/comment at > > about 48 hours after he started to work on CFS? > > Yes. So whats wrong then? Ingo decides to do a better scheduler - to some extent inspired by Con's work. And after 48 hours he publish first version that _anyone_ can see and comment on. Whats wrong with that? Did you expect some lengthy discussion before the coding phase started or what? Just trying to understand what you are arguing about. Sam