From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755559AbXGaIdA (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:33:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754448AbXGaIck (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:32:40 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:53689 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752512AbXGaIci (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 04:32:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:32:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: kriko Cc: ck@vds.kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) Message-ID: <20070731083230.GA14039@elte.hu> References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <1185839164.27166.7.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: 1.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: s X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=1.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_50 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 1.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * kriko wrote: > I'm trying to get kernel 2.6.22-ck and 2.6.23-rc1 work to test the new > cfs scheduler, but I get broken system. Networking is totally broken > (cannot find module for my marvell yukon gigabit ethernet in kconfig), > firewall / routing doesn't work (a bunch of error messages when > firewall script starts). Were there drastic changes in networking > support? Currently I'm running 2.6.21-ck1 on opensuse 10.2 and it > works fine. pick up 2.6.22-cfsv19 from: http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/ 2.6.23-rc1 is indeed a bit experimental. Ingo