From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: New audit record types for static network labels
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:37:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707311537.14940.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
I am currently working on a series of patches to add support for static
external network labels to NetLabel/SELinux. The idea is that a user could
define a physical interface, IP address, address mask, and context which
would be applied as an external label to the packet when an explicit label
was not present. This is similar to other trusted OSs which allow
administrators to assign labels to single level, unlabeled networks. For
those of you following the SELinux list it was discussed a month or two ago.
This is relevant to the audit subsystem because adding/removing these
address/context entries should most likely be audited for the same reasons we
audit other NetLabel or XFRM labeling related configuration changes. To
accomplish this I would like to suggest the addition of the following record
types, comments?
#define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STATICADD 14XX /* NetLabel: add a static label */
#define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STATICDEL 14XX /* NetLabel: del a static label */
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: linux-audit@redhat.com
Cc: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: New audit record types for static network labels
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:37:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200707311537.14940.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
I am currently working on a series of patches to add support for static
external network labels to NetLabel/SELinux. The idea is that a user could
define a physical interface, IP address, address mask, and context which
would be applied as an external label to the packet when an explicit label
was not present. This is similar to other trusted OSs which allow
administrators to assign labels to single level, unlabeled networks. For
those of you following the SELinux list it was discussed a month or two ago.
This is relevant to the audit subsystem because adding/removing these
address/context entries should most likely be audited for the same reasons we
audit other NetLabel or XFRM labeling related configuration changes. To
accomplish this I would like to suggest the addition of the following record
types, comments?
#define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STATICADD 14XX /* NetLabel: add a static label */
#define AUDIT_MAC_UNLBL_STATICDEL 14XX /* NetLabel: del a static label */
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-31 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-31 19:37 Paul Moore [this message]
2007-07-31 19:37 ` New audit record types for static network labels Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200707311537.14940.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.