From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cornelia Huck Subject: Re: Re: Possible problem with device_move() Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 15:03:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20070801150332.41f447c8@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> References: <200707312112.51043.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Alan Stern Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Marcel Holtmann List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:37:03 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern wrote: > Still, I suppose it would be best to add a "move device A to the end of > the dpm_active list" routine for use in this sort of situation. This > should be easy to do. Would it make sense if device_move() moved the new parent (and its parents) after the device in the dpm_active list automatically? Then we would only have to worry about reordering manually in very special cases.