From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1IHGDR-0004gz-Kr for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:46:33 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IHGDP-0004g7-GJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:46:31 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IHGDM-0004fh-Bg for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:46:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IHGDM-0004fe-6c for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:46:28 -0400 Received: from [69.60.117.155] (helo=aybabtu.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IHGDK-0000Ud-O7 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 05:46:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.10.6] (helo=aragorn) by aybabtu.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IHGCy-0004xJ-Gc for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:46:05 +0200 Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IHGGO-0002Bq-7i for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 11:49:36 +0200 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 11:49:36 +0200 From: Robert Millan To: The development of GRUB 2 Message-ID: <20070804094936.GA8207@aragorn> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: free as in freedom X-Message-Flag: Microsoft discourages use of Outlook. X-Debbugs-No-Ack: true User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Detected-Kernel: Genre and OS details not recognized. Subject: Re: New command dump X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 09:46:32 -0000 On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 11:33:38PM +0800, Bean wrote: > Hi, > > I have written a new command dump, it can hex dump content of file or memory. > > usage: > > dump [-s skip] [-n length] { FILE | (mem) } > > The output look just like command hexdump. I see that the output of hexdump is the same as "od -x". However, I find "od -tx1" more useful. Maybe it would be better to do that instead? -- Robert Millan My spam trap is honeypot@aybabtu.com. Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.