From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi bug fixes for 2.6.23-rc2 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 10:51:44 -0700 Message-ID: <20070807105144.0ba67d81.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1186248703.3439.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1186458941.6637.44.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070807001429.f8cb3b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1186496712.3414.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <46B88B91.4050703@garzik.org> <1186501124.3414.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:45241 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760895AbXHGRwD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:52:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1186501124.3414.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi , linux-kernel On Tue, 07 Aug 2007 10:38:44 -0500 James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 11:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > James Bottomley wrote: > > > The initial bsg submit went via the block git tree ... which I believe > > > you have in -mm. We only started taking the updates via the scsi tree > > > > Seven hours before you posted this, in > > <20070807001429.f8cb3b22.akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Andrew already > > noted it was not in -mm. > > > > A trivial examination of the broken-out mm patches backs up the absence > > of Jens' block tree, too. > > > > So let's put this myth / bad assumption to rest, shall we? > > Sorry ... I just assumed from the fact that it had been in the block git > tree for six months that it was also in -mm. bsg was never in the #for-akpm branch of git-block. So I assume that Jens had it in some other branch and for some reason never pulled it across into #for-akpm. It was most reasonable of you to expect that bsg had received a decent run in -mm.