From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Levon <john.levon@sun.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix xenmon/xentrace compile on Solaris
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2007 14:56:30 +0100
Message-ID: <20070807135630.GA16983@barman.uk.sun.com>
References: <ae465d2d2b2ec9ab3159.1186492441@xenbld>
	<C2DE36C6.13B58%keir@xensource.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C2DE36C6.13B58%keir@xensource.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xensource.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 02:48:38PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:

>   1. Don't use argp at all in xentrace/xenmon -- do they really need
> super-advanced argument parsing such that getopt will not suffice? As
> low-level not-usually-user-visible daemons I would say that porting them to
> getopt would be acceptable even if the command-line option syntax needs
> changing a little to cleanly do so.

We'd presumed that somebody had gone out of their way to use argp for a reason.
If it's not necessary we're certainly fine with doing that instead.

regards,
john