From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936604AbXHHQdk (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:33:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934434AbXHHQdS (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:33:18 -0400 Received: from www.osadl.org ([213.239.205.134]:39058 "EHLO mail.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936345AbXHHQdQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Aug 2007 12:33:16 -0400 From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Koch?= Organization: Linutronix To: Greg KH Subject: Re: [rfc] Re: [PATCH] Make UIO available for arm architecture Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 18:33:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.5 Cc: Jan Engelhardt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk References: <200708081808.13889.hjk@linutronix.de> <20070808161002.GA11153@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20070808161002.GA11153@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200708081833.12459.hjk@linutronix.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am Mittwoch 08 August 2007 18:10 schrieb Greg KH: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 06:15:21PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > > > On Aug 8 2007 18:08, Hans-J??rgen Koch wrote: > > >--- > > >Index: linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig > > >=================================================================== > > >--- linux-2.6.23-rc.orig/arch/arm/Kconfig 2007-08-08 17:52:02.000000000 +0200 > > >+++ linux-2.6.23-rc/arch/arm/Kconfig 2007-08-08 17:53:29.000000000 +0200 > > >@@ -1052,6 +1052,8 @@ > > > > > > source "drivers/dma/Kconfig" > > > > > >+source "drivers/uio/Kconfig" > > >+ > > > endmenu > > > > > > source "fs/Kconfig" > > > > I am raising a general question here. > > Should not such cross-platform things be made available in a general > > Kconfig rather than having to patch each arch's Kconfig? > > > > I am thinking of drivers/Kconfig for this one (of course I am aware that this > > requires an extra "depends on X86 || SPARC || others" in drivers/pci/Kconfig), > > and perhaps even a top-level Kconfig for things like truly arch-independent > > fs/Kconfig. > > Um, uio _is_ in drivers/Kconfig already :) Of course :-) > > But I'm guessing that ARM doesn't use that file yet? No, they don't. They source Kconfigs from each drivers subdirectory. > If so, I have no > objection to the above patch, but it should go through the ARM > developers, not me. OK, as I've CCed linux-arm-kernel, I hope Russell will do that. Thanks, Hans