From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"shannon.nelson@intel.com" <shannon.nelson@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function ___cpu_physical_id___
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 11:52:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070809115258.5372f76e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a44ae5cd0708090718v5dc19572k69087f170f9ba857@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 10:18:15 -0400
"Miles Lane" <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
> CC drivers/dma/ioat_dca.o
> drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c: In function 'ioat_dca_get_tag':
> drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'cpu_physical_id'
Looks like cpu_physical_id() doesn't get implemented if CONFIG_SMP=n.
Either ioat needs to stop using cpu_physical_id() if SMP=n, or the
supported architectures (i386, x86_64, ia64) should provide a non-SMP
version of cpu_physical_id(). Preferably the latter, I'd say.
Something like this, I suppose...
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
i386, x86_64 and ia64 implement cpu_physical_id() if CONFIG_SMP=y.
Provide a uniprocessor stub so that callers will dtrt.
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nelson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/smp.h | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff -puN include/linux/smp.h~implement-cpu_physical_id-on-smp=n include/linux/smp.h
--- a/include/linux/smp.h~implement-cpu_physical_id-on-smp=n
+++ a/include/linux/smp.h
@@ -108,6 +108,11 @@ static inline void smp_send_reschedule(i
0; \
})
+static inline unsigned cpu_physical_id(unsigned cpu)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
#endif /* !SMP */
/*
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-09 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-09 14:18 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function ‘cpu_physical_id’ Miles Lane
2007-08-09 14:32 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-09 18:24 ` Miles Lane
2007-08-09 18:52 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-08-10 13:13 ` 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 -- drivers/dma/ioat_dca.c:177: error: implicit declaration of function ___cpu_physical_id___ Miles Lane
2007-08-10 13:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-10 16:46 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070809115258.5372f76e.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
--cc=shannon.nelson@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.