From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: inconsistency in /proc/acpi directory structure? Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 12:02:54 -0400 Message-ID: <200708091202.54943.lenb@kernel.org> References: <20070809123943.GD3939@ngolde.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:39593 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936382AbXHIRWK (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2007 13:22:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070809123943.GD3939@ngolde.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Nico Golde Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Nico, I have to second what Henrique wrote. Please avoid /proc/acpi/* whenever you can can. We are trying to get rid of it completely, but that is only partly done. I really resist changes to /proc/acpi/* because I consider it legacy and would rather the effort be focused on the new sysfs interfaces. cheers, -Len