From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "=?utf-8?B?RGFuaWVs?=" Subject: Re: Re: ipset merge Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 11:49:37 +0800 Message-ID: <200708131149372183555@163.com> References: , <46B04D3B.6090706@netfilter.org>, , <20070811155354.GA5594@safeTpin.homeunix.org>, <200708131144415933423@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: =?utf-8?B?bmV0ZmlsdGVyLWRldmVs?= Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org > >On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > >> - throw away binding of sets (the hackish part of ipset), which is >> complex and not efficient enough >> - add new set types as a substitute of the purged out bindings > >an ip-port set would be really nice ;) That's also what I need when I tried to match some nat-traversal address. > >>> Jozsef is currently working on that. >> >> Yep, slower than I hoped :-(. > >thanx > > >=;p/ud aka nerdpunk > >-- >auf der flucht vor einem selber und der rache der krawatten >springt man eher aus dem fenster, als ueber seinen schatten... > - kaput krauts >gpg-key #C3B04767 > > Regards Daniel tooldcas@163.com 2007-08-13