From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Documentation - How to debug ACPI Problems Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:40:01 -0400 Message-ID: <200708141140.02233.lenb@kernel.org> References: <1181140008.28514.259.camel@queen.suse.de> <9a8748490706060759s5d8c43bdoc34334fcf56ee96@mail.gmail.com> <1181579321.28514.304.camel@queen.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:50139 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763951AbXHNPkP (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Aug 2007 11:40:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1181579321.28514.304.camel@queen.suse.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: trenn@suse.de Cc: "Brown, Len" , linux-kernel , linux-acpi , Jesper Juhl , Zhang Rui , Alexey Starikovskiy > +Thomas Renninger , 2007 > +Copyright (C) 2007 SUSE Linux GmbH While it seems to be generally customary to identify the authors of Documentation files, it doesn't seem to be customary for them to assert a copyright. Is this really necessary? My concern is that it could discourage contributors for user or changing the text in any way they see fit. can anybody offer guidance on this? thanks, -Len