Re: git-svn: Finding the svn-URL of the current branch in git

[Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>]

Peter Baumann <waste.manager@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 08:29:23PM +0200, Matthias Kleine wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > when running "git-svn dcommit" git-svn tries to find the svn-URL of the 
> > current branch int git by looking for the most recent git log-entry 
> > corresponding to a commit in svn (see working_head_info in git-svn).  In 
> > case a merge just happended this might be the URL of another branch. Would 
> > using "log --first-parent" instead of a plain "log" take care of this 
> > problem or would it have other undesirable consequences?
> >
> 
> I had this situation, too.
> 
> 
> 			a = svn branch 'a'
> 	m		b = svn branch 'b' (in my case, it was trunk)
>       /   \		m = a merge of branch 'a' and 'b', not yet commited to svn
>      a     b
> 
> So trying to dcommit m, git svn can't figure out on which branch, as 'a'
> and 'b' are both reachable. I had to use a graft file to lose one of the
> parents, which let git-svn commit to SVN.
> 
> So for a short fix to get the work done, you could create a graft file
> where you fake m to only have one parent.

Ok.  I'm regretting making 733a65aa5d33196fac708ebd12a98a1060cbf3c2 now.

It doesn't introduce the problem, but it does encourage it.  I still
happen to believe allowing git-merges in repositories that try to
interoperate with SVN is just giving rope for users to hang themselves
with.


Junio:
Would you object to having git-merge spew a big fat warning
and/or outright refuse to let git-merge run on git-svn repositories?


13c823fb520eaf1cded520213cf0ae4c3268208d was introduced to allow using
git-format-patch + git-am to apply patches from other branches in SVN,
which is the recommended way to do "merging" with git-svn.

> On the longer run, I would make sense to have an option to explicitly
> specify on which SVN branch 'git-svn dcommit' should operate.

Patches welcome :)

-- 
Eric Wong