From: Dan Aloni <da-x@monatomic.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work()
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 14:53:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070701153749.GA111@tv-sign.ru>
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:37:49PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> I don't know how to test this patch, the ack/nack from maintainer is wanted.
>
> flush_scheduled_work() is evil and should be avoided. Change tty_set_ldisc()
> and release_dev() to use cancel_delayed_work_sync/cancel_work_sync.
>
> I am not sure we really need to call do_tty_hangup() when cancel_work_sync()
> returns true, but this matches the current behaviour.
I also noticed this problem recently with 2.6.22, on a 2-CPU box where there
was one SCHED_RR userspace process stuck in a busy loop. The box was completely
responsive but had this annoyance where all tty closings were stuck in
flush_scheduled_work(). It's especially noticable when you ssh to the machine
and then try to log out.
A temporary workaround was to give just the workqueue events/* threads a
SCHED_FIFO static priority of 99, but I have kept that small patch to
myself (figured it's just too nasty).
--
Dan Aloni
XIV LTD, http://www.xivstorage.com
da-x (at) monatomic.org, dan (at) xiv.co.il
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-01 15:37 [PATCH 3/3] tty_io.c: don't use flush_scheduled_work() Oleg Nesterov
2007-07-01 16:22 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-01 16:47 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-16 11:53 ` Dan Aloni [this message]
2007-08-16 16:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-21 6:09 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070816115349.GA26908@localdomain \
--to=da-x@monatomic.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.