From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:36:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708170036.34276.agruen@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29015.1187178055@redhat.com>
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 13:40, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi Linus, Al,
>
> Would you object greatly to functions like vfs_mkdir() gaining a security
> parameter? What I'm thinking of is this:
>
> int vfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
> struct security *security)
>
> Where the security context is the state of the context at the time the call
> was issued:
>
> struct security {
> uid_t fsuid;
> git_t fsgid;
> struct group_info *group_info;
> void *security;
> struct key *session_keyring;
> struct key *process_keyring;
> struct key *thread_keyring;
>
> And perhaps:
>
> struct audit_context *audit_context;
> seccomp_t seccomp;
> };
>
> This would, for the most part, be a temporary affair, being set up by such
> as sys_mkdir()/sys_mkdirat() from data held in task_struct.
That's additional setup work unless that struct can be embedded in
task_struct. We would be complicating the common / fast / local case to
simplify the not-so-common case or cases.
-- Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-15 11:40 Adding a security parameter to VFS functions David Howells
2007-08-15 11:40 ` David Howells
2007-08-15 11:40 ` David Howells
2007-08-15 16:23 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-08-15 16:23 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-08-15 16:52 ` David Howells
2007-08-15 16:52 ` David Howells
2007-08-15 16:52 ` David Howells
2007-08-16 22:20 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-08-16 22:36 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2007-08-16 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-16 23:30 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-08-16 23:34 ` Al Viro
2007-08-17 18:05 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-08-20 12:09 ` David Howells
2007-08-20 12:09 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708170036.34276.agruen@suse.de \
--to=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.