From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: solo@google.com, clameter@sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: cpusets vs. mempolicy and how to get interleaving
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 11:25:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070820112538.42337443.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.0.99.0708200104340.4218@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
David wrote:
> Like I've already said, there is absolutely no reason to add a new MPOL
> variant for this case. As Christoph already mentioned, PF_SPREAD_PAGE
> gets similar results. So just modify mpol_rebind_policy() so that if
> /dev/cpuset/<cpuset>/memory_spread_page is true, you rebind the
> interleaved nodemask to all nodes in the new nodemask. That's the
> well-defined cpuset interface for getting an interleaved behavior already.
Hmm ... nice.
As David likely guesses, I didn't read his earlier suggestion of this.
Thanks for repeating it.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-18 0:22 cpusets vs. mempolicy and how to get interleaving Ethan Solomita
2007-08-18 0:29 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-08-19 10:18 ` David Rientjes
2007-08-20 0:53 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-08-20 2:34 ` Paul Jackson
2007-08-20 5:47 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-08-20 5:53 ` Paul Jackson
2007-08-20 8:10 ` David Rientjes
2007-08-20 18:25 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2007-08-20 18:28 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-08-20 18:40 ` David Rientjes
2007-08-20 19:50 ` Ethan Solomita
2007-08-20 19:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-21 14:14 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2007-08-18 1:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-18 1:51 ` Ethan Solomita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070820112538.42337443.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=solo@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.