From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFABDDFF9 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 03:50:55 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail01.m-online.net (mail.m-online.net [192.168.3.149]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0E52232C1 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:50:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ibook.aepfle.de (DSL01.83.171.157.120.ip-pool.NEFkom.net [83.171.157.120]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1A903FA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:50:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:51:21 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: bogus vscsi dt node on iseries Message-ID: <20070822175121.GA21233@aepfle.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Does anyone know why dt_vdevices() creates a vscsi node on legacy iseries? I'm sure only viodasd and viocd is required as blockdevice type.