From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.10]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C345DDEFE for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:42:11 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:42:39 +0200 From: Olaf Hering To: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: bogus vscsi dt node on iseries Message-ID: <20070823054239.GA24251@aepfle.de> References: <20070822175121.GA21233@aepfle.de> <20070823133621.830245c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <20070823133621.830245c4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Aug 23, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 19:51:21 +0200 Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone know why dt_vdevices() creates a vscsi node on legacy iseries? > > I'm sure only viodasd and viocd is required as blockdevice type. > > Because the IBM vscsi client (in theory) works on legacy iSeries. I'm asking because there are many unneeded nodes. Have you tried to create only the nodes for disks/cds that are really present and modify viodasd to use only device-tree data?