From: pradeep singh <rautelap@gmail.com>
To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, "Puthiyaparambil,
Aravindh" <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@unisys.com>
Subject: Re: how many processors does xen support in hardware?
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 23:30:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708242330.45499.rautelap@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2F4AE73.148B7%Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk>
On Friday 24 August 2007 20:19:07 Keir Fraser wrote:
> Where did you get this number 255 from?
Sorry i meant, while i compile the xen kernel i can configure kernel upto a
max of 255. right?
And i guess that means the number of CPUs you can compile your SMP kernel to
work with.
what did i miss? :-/
thanks
--pradeep
>
> K.
>
> On 24/8/07 15:32, "pradeep singh rautela" <rautelap@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/24/07, Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
>
> <aravindh.puthiyaparambil@unisys.com>
>
> > wrote:
> > Xen x86_32/PAE supports 32 logical CPUs. This is a hard limit and
> > there is no easy way to increase this.
> >
> > Xen x86_64 supports 64 logical
> > CPUs. You need to compile Xen with max_phys_cpus=64 to enable this
> > support. If you want to go beyond 126 LCPUs some patching is needed.
> >
> > I guess you can
> > theoretically go up to 255 but I think you might run out of GDT slots
> > before that.
>
> Right, so why keep 255 there at all? I mean why hard code it to a
>
> > max
>
> 255 then?Put it at a number a little near or higher than what Xen
>
> > is
>
> actually capable of.
>
> thanks
>
> > Aravindh Puthiyaparambil
> > Virtualization
> > Engineer
> > Virtual Systems Development
> > Unisys, Tredyffrin PA
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
> > [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of tgh
> > Sent:
> > Friday, August 24, 2007 7:31 AM
> > To: pradeep singh rautela
> > Cc:
> > xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] how many processors
> > does xen support in hardware?
> >
> > pradeep singh rautela 写道:
> > > On 8/24/07,
> >
> > tgh <tianguanhua@ncic.ac.cn> wrote:
> > >> hi
> > >> how many processors
> >
> > does xen support in hardware for the practical
> >
> > >> system?
> > >
> > > Thats
> >
> > would be 255 i guess.
> >
> > thank you for your reply
> > but I want to kown the
> > max number of hardware cpus the xen could
> > support, or the xen's scalability
> > in the aspect of cpu number,not in the
> > aspect of the VM number
> >
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >> what is the max number of processors in
> >
> > the practice system running
> >
> > >> under xen ?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks in
> >
> > advance
> >
> > >> _______________________________________________
> >
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> >
> > >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> >
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> >
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
> --
>
> --
> pradeep singh rautela
>
> "Genius is 1% inspiration, and 99% perspiration" -
>
> > not me :)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-24 18:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 9:32 Is QoS of virtual disk not necessary? Satoshi Uchida
2007-08-22 12:39 ` Keir Fraser
2007-08-24 8:27 ` Satoshi Uchida
2007-08-24 15:36 ` Keir Fraser
2007-08-24 17:26 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-24 17:40 ` Keir Fraser
2007-08-24 20:53 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <006101c7e953$15afd230$4c87380a@ad.spf.cl.nec.co.jp>
2007-08-28 11:24 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-24 9:48 ` how many processors does xen support in hardware ? tgh
2007-08-24 10:06 ` pradeep singh rautela
2007-08-24 11:31 ` tgh
2007-08-24 13:34 ` how many processors does xen support in hardware? Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
2007-08-24 14:32 ` pradeep singh rautela
2007-08-24 14:49 ` Keir Fraser
2007-08-24 18:00 ` pradeep singh [this message]
2007-08-24 18:04 ` Keir Fraser
2007-08-24 18:15 ` pradeep singh
2007-08-25 7:29 ` tgh
[not found] ` <46d0121a.0589300a.5f14.061c@mx.google.com>
2007-08-26 13:26 ` tgh
2007-08-24 15:02 ` Puthiyaparambil, Aravindh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708242330.45499.rautelap@gmail.com \
--to=rautelap@gmail.com \
--cc=Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=aravindh.puthiyaparambil@unisys.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.