From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: git-daemon on NSLU2 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:21:33 +0200 Message-ID: <200708250121.33924.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <9e4733910708232254w4e74ca72o917c7cadae4ee0f4@mail.gmail.com> <7vbqcwcze3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Aug 25 01:21:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IOiTL-0005E5-Sp for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 25 Aug 2007 01:21:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761683AbXHXXVm (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:21:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754209AbXHXXVm (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:21:42 -0400 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]:47148 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759388AbXHXXVl (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:21:41 -0400 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id g13so734234nfb for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=SaeJ4GxOZH18zwXGK/Kdfc/pqHydcHazBiL5q7v6rs94VYs167MIfADjWNSwsVP2EV6dAVcZ1KkjF6JnGpJ8B1kTNRX1zCJUAXT3H0nkzUFChMAGxC4bPGv3c+zPdzpfEbk20Rsh/n5IQnypKgU89gOB0eE2yD9zJND/Rk6GdeI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=VKcq9OjUSuUL8yzMwFJcJdVLNNp+Ne5Hz6/SDoWH8dxVtvjTqNK1vlRfytPis+x0jrAEUF4DK7xHM8qno2PDkSMvw3O7N/CTuMYOmJW6rosAhJ4Etj1jduAZzBKEcFPZjM1U6ZyaW7UmGFiY982YWncjkNIpM9qCNsNjg9G6+/I= Received: by 10.86.23.17 with SMTP id 17mr2626920fgw.1187997699265; Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-89-229-8-65.torun.mm.pl ( [89.229.8.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 28sm7015585fkx.2007.08.24.16.21.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 24 Aug 2007 16:21:38 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <7vbqcwcze3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > Jakub Narebski writes: > >> There was idea to special case clone (just concatenate the packs, the >> receiving side as someone told there can detect pack boundaries; do not >> forget to pack loose objects, first), instead of using generic fetch --all >> for clone, bnut no code. Code speaks louder than words (although if someone >> would provide details of pack boundary detection...) > > I have to say that "although ..." part of that statement > disqualifies this to be called an "idea". Ermm... if I remember correctly during discussion (single subthread) there were provided details, or at least idea, of how to separate concatented packs into individual packs. Unfortunately I haven't saved the message, and do not remember enogh of it to search archives... I should have wrote "remind" instead of "provide" there... > Really, I find that you (yes, in this case I am not generalizing > but talking specifically about you) tend to overuse the word > "idea" when you talk things that are not yet even at that stage > yet. I'm not native English speaker... ;-) Seriously, it's a fault of mine... -- Jakub Narebski Poland