From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@fastwebnet.it>
To: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Bob Picco <bob.picco@hp.com>,
john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "double" hpet clocksource && hard freeze [bisected]
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 22:21:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070828222119.5ef295e3@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070828102709.sybsmvvdw0o8swo4@webmail.df.eu>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 10:27:09 +0200
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> wrote:
> Luck, Tony wrote:
> > [...] Given that the hang went away when you applied the earlier patch, I
> > conclude that the drivers/char/hpet.c code is the one that got selected when
> > you had two "hpet" entries ... and that there is something wrong with that
> > code that doesn't work right on x86_64.
>
> Apparently, the 'generic' code was just copied from ia64 and assumes that the
> timer is 64 bits. This is not true with hardware from VIA (even on x86_64).
The hardware of this PC is Intel, not VIA.
>
> This patch should make it work (although I'd prefer to set the mask
> dynamically
> according to the hardware caps).
>
> --- a/drivers/char/hpet.c Tue Aug 28 09:42:22 2007
> +++ b/drivers/char/hpet.c Tue Aug 28 10:16:54 2007
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
> .name = "hpet",
> .rating = 250,
> .read = read_hpet,
> - .mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(64),
> + .mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(32),
Anyway, I've applied it (manually... whitespace/mime damage) to -rc4 and
it seems to work, no crash so far (I'm sure I'm testing it because
plain -rc4 doesn't have the "2hpet" fix and still manifest the problem).
--
Paolo Ornati
Linux 2.6.23-rc4-dirty on x86_64
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-28 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-28 8:27 "double" hpet clocksource && hard freeze [bisected] Clemens Ladisch
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Paolo Ornati [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-23 20:21 Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 20:22 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 20:41 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-23 21:05 ` john stultz
2007-08-23 21:38 ` Bob Picco
2007-08-24 7:03 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-23 21:41 ` john stultz
2007-08-24 7:01 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 12:46 ` Bob Picco
2007-08-24 13:27 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 16:04 ` Luck, Tony
2007-08-24 16:13 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 18:17 ` john stultz
2007-08-27 20:34 ` Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino
2007-08-27 21:39 ` john stultz
2007-08-28 6:07 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 9:03 ` Paolo Ornati
2007-08-24 18:43 ` john stultz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070828222119.5ef295e3@localhost \
--to=ornati@fastwebnet.it \
--cc=bob.picco@hp.com \
--cc=clemens@ladisch.de \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.