From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 05:42:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070829034214.GA30551@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070828222718.GI1894@linux-os.sc.intel.com>
* Siddha, Suresh B <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 12:31:03PM -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote:
> > Essentially I observed that nice 0 tasks still endup on two cores of same
> > package, with out getting spread out to two different packages. This behavior
> > is same with out this fix and this fix doesn't help in any way.
>
> Ingo, Appended patch seems to fix the issue and as far as I can test,
> seems ok to me.
thanks! I've queued your fix up for .23 merge. I've done a quick test
and it indeed seems to work well.
> This is a quick fix for .23. Peter Williams and myself plan to look at
> code cleanups in this area (HT/MC optimizations) post .23
>
> BTW, with this fix, do you want to retain the current FUZZ value?
what value would you suggest? I was thinking about using
busiest_rq->curr->load.weight instead, to always keep rotating tasks.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-29 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 1:01 [patch] sched: fix broken smt/mc optimizations with CFS Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-23 10:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-23 11:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-23 12:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-23 17:42 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:19 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-27 19:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-27 19:31 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-28 22:27 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-08-29 3:42 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-09-04 23:35 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-09-04 23:46 ` Siddha, Suresh B
2007-09-05 10:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-27 16:32 ` Torsten Kaiser
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070829034214.GA30551@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.