From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: DervishD <lartc@dervishd.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 07:57:07 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] cpufreq affects rate in, at least, htb
Message-Id: <20070829075707.GC18688@DervishD>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <20070828074738.GF17475@DervishD>
In-Reply-To: <20070828074738.GF17475@DervishD>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

    Hi Adam :)

 * Adam James <ad@heliosphan.co.uk> dixit:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 09:47:38 +0200
> DervishD <lartc@dervishd.net> wrote:
>=20
> >     I've tested this and having a cpufreq that slows down the CPU
> > affects the rate of HTB. My ondemand cpufreq governor scales down the
> > CPU frequency about 40% and this is more or less the slowdown the rate
> > suffers, 40%.
>=20
> This is expected behaviour when CONFIG_NET_SCH_CLK_CPU is defined:

    Sh*t! I thought I changed that when I turned on cpufreq and set it
to jiffies, but I've seen my /proc/kconfig.gz and it's not true, I have
CONFIG_NET_SCH_CLK_CPU :((((

    Sorry for the noise, I'm embarrassed... And thanks a lot for your
help.

    Ra=FAl N=FA=F1ez de Arenas Coronado

--=20
Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net
It's my PC and I'll cry if I want to... RAmen!
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc