From: David McCullough <David_Mccullough@securecomputing.com>
To: Eran Ben-Avi <eranpublic@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, ocf-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ?
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 08:44:48 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070830224448.GA11140@securecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <440337.35301.qm@web62504.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
>
> --- David McCullough
> <David_Mccullough@securecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Jivin Eran Ben-Avi lays it down ...
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I tested IPSec(tunnel mode) routing performance
> > between 2 GbE ports using packet generator(SMARTBIT)
> > on ARM 500MHz with latest OCF patched on
> > Openswan2.4.9 and I noticed the callback functions
> > are using workqueue.
> > > Since RX was performed in NAPI mode with higher
> > priority then TX (in workqueue), the callback
> > function(in ipsec_ocf.c) was starved with zero
> > routing.
> > > The problem was solved after I switched to use
> > tasklet instead of the workqueue.
> > > Is there a room for updating next OCF release ?
> >
> > Sure, send in a patch. This is against
> > ocf-linux-20070727 right ?
>
> Yes.
> Can you please estimate when next release will be
> ready?
When there is a need, I can turn it around in a day or so.
I could also post a patch that is current much more quickly
if you would prefer ?
Cheers,
Davidm
--
David McCullough, david_mccullough@securecomputing.com, Ph:+61 734352815
Secure Computing - SnapGear http://www.uCdot.org http://www.cyberguard.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 22:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070827224021.GA23450@securecomputing.com>
2007-08-30 7:58 ` Openswan 2.4.9 - tasklet or workqueue ? Eran Ben-Avi
2007-08-30 22:44 ` David McCullough [this message]
2007-09-11 19:19 ` Kabir Ahsan-r9aahw
2007-09-12 12:13 ` David McCullough
2007-09-26 14:26 ` David McCullough
2007-11-01 14:34 Eran Ben-Avi
2007-11-05 3:35 ` David McCullough
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-27 7:26 Eran Ben-Avi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070830224448.GA11140@securecomputing.com \
--to=david_mccullough@securecomputing.com \
--cc=eranpublic@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ocf-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.