From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Schwebel Subject: Re: jitter bursts Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2007 11:13:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20070901091312.GV23573@pengutronix.de> References: <20070831151727.GT23573@pengutronix.de> <46D83A99.3080707@l1nuxh4ck3r.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Michael Olbrich , kiszka@rts.uni-hannover.de To: Bernhard Kuhn Return-path: Received: from metis.extern.pengutronix.de ([83.236.181.26]:59264 "EHLO metis.extern.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754216AbXIAJNU (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 05:13:20 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46D83A99.3080707@l1nuxh4ck3r.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 05:58:17PM +0200, Bernhard Kuhn wrote: > I guess these latencies didn't show up at the system you are porting > from? Is the HW setup from the system you are porting from the same > as you are using with -rt? Both boxes are x86 (one normal PC - Celeron 2.4 GHz / ICH5 chipset, and one ETX PIII mobile, 1 GHz) with 2.6.22.1-rt9; we also tried several versions, without changes in the behaviour. > Are both, sender and receiver are using -rt? Yup. > What happens if you are using the old system as sender and -rt for the > receiver? What happens if you are using -rt as sender and -rt as > receiver? That's the scenario. > Are you using an onboard nvidia SATA controller? Nope; the box is currently off, but it's the same hardware as this one: rsc@metis:~> lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P PCI to AGP Controller (rev 02) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #1 (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #2 (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #3 (rev 02) 00:1d.3 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI Controller #4 (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) USB2 EHCI Controller (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge (rev c2) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) LPC Interface Bridge (rev 02) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) IDE Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corporation 82801EB/ER (ICH5/ICH5R) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) 02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 02:09.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82557/8/9 [Ethernet Pro 100] (rev 05) 02:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ViRGE/DX or /GX (rev 01) We'll make a release of the test program on monday, I think it should be possible to easily reproduce the scenario if you have two boxes and a 100 MBit hub. Robert -- Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Entwicklungszentrum Nord http://www.pengutronix.de