From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1ISIWK-0004E1-1G for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:27:40 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISIWI-0004Dh-Qx for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:27:38 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ISIWH-0004DV-R0 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:27:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ISIWH-0004DS-Na for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:27:37 -0400 Received: from ns39764.ovh.net ([91.121.25.85] helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ISIWH-0004Ok-23 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:27:37 -0400 Received: from [10.8.0.46] (unknown [10.8.0.46]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38F53EBEA; Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:28:09 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: grub-devel@gnu.org Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 22:27:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <000001c772ae$a4fa46d0$030010ac@temjin> In-Reply-To: <000001c772ae$a4fa46d0$030010ac@temjin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200709032227.33862.okuji@enbug.org> X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Cc: Hitoshi Ozeki Subject: Re: i386-pc 'chainloader' is something wrong. (RE: I write a patch for Japanese NEC i386 old computers.) X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2007 20:27:38 -0000 On Friday 30 March 2007 11:34, Hitoshi Ozeki wrote: > I wrote: > > * When doing 'chainloader' command, the all disk devices cannot use via > > 'dev.c', > > because of doing 'grub_loader_unload_func' on 'grub_loader_set'. > > I think it is disirable to do 'grub_loader_unload_func' on > > 'grub_*_boot'. > > Okuji-san wrote: > > Could you elaborate on why this is bad? > > At first, excuse me. 'grub_loader_unload_func' is not bad. > Please see 'grub-1.96/loader/i386/pc/chainloader.c' and > 'grub-1.96/kern/loader.c' I have fixed this right now. Thank you. Okuji