From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Subject: Re: RFC: Xen 3.1.1 Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:30:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20070904133038.GA26178@redhat.com> References: <20070903191808.GC22983@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 08:12:58AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 3/9/07 20:18, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > > > I'd like to get the PVFB changes to replace libvncserver with QEMU into the > > release. I'll post updated patches ASAP. > > > > I recently managed to get support for TLS + x509 certificate authentication > > merged into upstream QEMU for the VNC server so we have some serious quality > > security there. The back-port to QEMU 0.9.0 in Xen should be fairly easy for > > me to do, so I'll hopefully be able submit that in the next week too. > > Does backporting these to 3.1 make sense given that it uses qemu 0.8.2? I've backported them to 3.1 / QEMU 0.8.2 for the Fedora 8, test2 release but it was not exactly pretty. There've been a fair few changes to QEMU & its VNC server between 0.8.2 and 0.9.0, plus the various Xen specific patches, so I had to pull in a fair number of other changes first. If there's interest I can send out the patches against 3.1, but otherwise I'll just focus on the xen-unstable tree. Regards, Dan. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|