Re: [PATCH] Add a new lstat and fstat implementation based on Win32 API

[Rutger Nijlunsing <rutger@nospam.com>]

On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > 
> > > Johannes Schindelin schrieb:
> > > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> > > > > Therefore, I've pushed out a fixup patch at the top of mingw.git's 
> > > > > devel branch that converts mtime to local time
> > > > 
> > > > On Linux, we compare to UTC to begin with, right?  We should do that 
> > > > here, too...  So if time(NULL) does not return UTC on MinGW, we have 
> > > > to wrap that function, too.
> > > 
> > > According to MSDN, time(NULL) returns "the number of seconds elapsed 
> > > since [epoch] according to the system clock". Please don't ask me what 
> > > "the system clock" is.
> > 
> > I think I know.  From my QEmu adventures I know that DOS/Windows expects 
> > the system clock to be set to local time, in contrast to _all_ other 
> > operating systems.
> 
> Now I am utterly confused.  MSDN says
> 
> 	FILETIME
> 
> 	Contains a 64-bit value representing the number of 100-nanosecond 
> 	intervals since January 1, 1601 (UTC).
> 
> Hmm.


[Warning: war stories ahead...]

If you really, really want to know more:

http://search.cpan.org/~shay/Win32-UTCFileTime-1.45/lib/Win32/UTCFileTime.pm


-- 
Rutger Nijlunsing ---------------------------------- eludias ed dse.nl
never attribute to a conspiracy which can be explained by incompetence
----------------------------------------------------------------------