All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
To: "Daniel J Blueman" <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
	"Richard Ballantyne" <richardballantyne@gmail.com>,
	"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: file system for solid state disks
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 13:34:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709051334.14599.vda.linux@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6278d2220708230155j18248f2cr3cc697a7acbaa930@mail.gmail.com>

On Thursday 23 August 2007 09:55, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On 23 Aug, 07:00, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de> wrote:
> > On Aug 23 2007 01:01, Richard Ballantyne wrote:
> > >What file system that is already in the linux kernel do people recommend
> > >I use for my laptop that now contains a solid state disk?
> >
> > If I had to choose, the list of options seems to be:
> >
> > - logfs
> >   [unmerged]
> >
> > - UBI layer with any fs you like
> >   [just a guess]
> >
> > - UDF in Spared Flavor (mkudffs --media-type=cdrw --utf8)
> >   [does not support ACLs/quotas]
> 
> Isn't it that with modern rotational wear-levelling, re-writing hot
> blocks many times is not an issue, as they are internally moved around
> anyway? So, using a journalled filesystem such as ext3 is still good
> (robustness and maturity in mind).

Crap hardware (one which only _claim_ to do it) is out there,
and is typically cheaper, so users preferentially buy that ;)
--
vda

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-05 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-23  8:55 file system for solid state disks Daniel J Blueman
2007-08-23 12:45 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2007-08-23 12:56   ` Daniel J Blueman
2007-08-23 13:43     ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-23 13:43       ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-23 15:09         ` Daniel J Blueman
2007-09-05 12:34 ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2007-09-05 12:56   ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-09-05 13:04     ` Manu Abraham
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-25  8:41 Just Marc
2007-08-30 18:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-30 18:26   ` Just Marc
2007-08-23  5:01 Richard Ballantyne
2007-08-23  5:52 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-23 10:26   ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 11:25     ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-29 17:36       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-08-29 17:57         ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200709051334.14599.vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --to=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
    --cc=daniel.blueman@gmail.com \
    --cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardballantyne@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.