From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ITAEe-0007KS-Vw for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:49:05 +0100 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e5.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l865mgoD017079 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:48:42 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.5) with ESMTP id l865mfVL463912 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:48:41 -0400 Received: from d01av02.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l865mfRh021363 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:48:41 -0400 Received: from vivek.in.ibm.com ([9.124.218.235]) by d01av02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l865meZU021343 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2007 01:48:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 11:18:58 +0530 From: Vivek Goyal Subject: Re: DEBUG_INFO -> DEBUG_KERNEL dependency Message-ID: <20070906054858.GD17336@in.ibm.com> References: <20070905122311.GA11013@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070905122311.GA11013@suse.de> Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: kexec@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:23:11PM +0200, Bernhard Walle wrote: > Hi, > > Subject says all. Why does DEBUG_INFO depend on DEBUG_KERNEL? IMO it's > also desirable to use Kdump when DEBUG_KERNEL is not enabled. > That's true. But is DEBUG_KERNEL hurting you. You can disable all other debug options under DEBUG_KERNEL and only enable DEBUG_INFO. Logically it makes sense to put all kernel debug features under KERNEL_DEBUG. Though DEBUG_INFO probably can be brought out. But is there huge piece of code under DEBUG_KERNEL which is a problem for you? Thanks Vivek _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec