From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
To: Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
sam@ravnborg.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 23:19:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070906211955.GF4480@stusta.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1ITOhz-0001wd-Uu@flower>
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 11:16:15PM +0200, Oleg Verych wrote:
> * Thu, 6 Sep 2007 22:39:31 +0200
>
> []
> >> > His patch improves the build process.
> >>
> >> I would like to know timing, btw. Size, especially shown 1%, doesn't
> >> matter if link time increased dramatically. `Allyes' config, when i
> >> had fast and rammish machine was terrible thing (last winter). If 32
> >> cores/cpus is will of author, then i'm even more suspicious.
> >
> > For non-developers size and speed of the kernel matter much more than
> > compile time.
>
> I'm talking about benefits for the process (developers, testers) and
> the result (end users, dogs eating own food :).
Your claim was that link time was more important than code size, and
that claim is in many cases wrong.
> > When you go towards embedded systems with limited resources a 1% size
> > decrease would often be worth it even if it would (hypothetically)
> > increase the compile time by a factor of 10.
>
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 5159478 1005139 406784 6571401 644589 linux-2.6.23-rc4.org/vmlinux
> 5131822 996090 401439 6529351 63a147 linux-2.6.23-rc4.gc/vmlinux
>
> Are this numbers show embedded target? I think no. Also time factor of
> *10* can be spent more productively reviewing actual code of parts, that
> are going to be embedded, no?
First of all, please lookup the word "hypothetically" in a dictionary.
And code review and Denys' patch have cumulative effects since his patch
results in improvements that can't be resonably done other than at
the ld and/or gcc level.
> []
> >> > There's nothing that requires treatment.
> >>
> >> [Help for] The developers/contributors of those drivers, no?
> >>...
> >
> > They did everything right.
> >
> > You should better try to understand the problem first before behaving as
> > if you knew everything better than everyone else...
>
> OK, thank you very much. Now, describe what problem you are talking
> about, please. I see non.
If you don't understand what the patches in this thread are about then
you shouldn't have started commenting on this thread...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-06 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-05 13:43 [PATCH 0/3] build system: section garbage collection for vmlinux Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 13:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 13:49 ` [PATCH 2/3] " Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] " Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 18:40 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-06 10:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 22:33 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-10 12:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-10 19:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-10 19:14 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-11 11:23 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-11 11:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-05 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-06 10:59 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 22:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-08 15:02 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 15:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Oleg Verych
2007-09-05 18:46 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 20:34 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-05 21:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 10:55 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 11:40 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 12:21 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 20:43 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 20:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 21:16 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 21:19 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2007-09-06 22:01 ` Oleg Verych
2007-09-06 22:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-06 12:33 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 16:29 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 18:37 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 18:38 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:14 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 19:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:49 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-05 19:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-06 10:57 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-06 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-06 17:07 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-07 16:31 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-07 17:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-09-07 17:19 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-07 17:30 ` Denys Vlasenko
2007-09-07 17:38 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:31 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-05 19:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-05 19:46 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-05 19:27 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070906211955.GF4480@stusta.de \
--to=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olecom@flower.upol.cz \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.