From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
Matthew Dharm <mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:12:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070910151258.GA16802@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E55378.1090600@panasas.com>
> +void scsi_eh_prep_cmnd(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd,
> + struct scsi_eh_save_cmnd_info *sesci, unsigned char *cmnd,
> + int cmnd_size, int copy_sense)
I think just struct "struct scsi_eh_save *save" is descriptive enough and
almost fits on a line as well.. Also continuation of the prototype
is indented by two tabs normally.
> +struct scsi_eh_save_cmnd_info {
> + int old_result;
> + enum dma_data_direction old_data_direction;
> + unsigned char old_cmd_len;
> + unsigned char old_cmnd[MAX_COMMAND_SIZE];
> +
> + void* old_buffer;
void *old_buffer;
> + unsigned old_bufflen;
> + unsigned short old_use_sg;
> + int old_resid;
> +
> + struct scatterlist sense_sgl;
> +};
I think you can kill the old prefixes in the struct, they're saved
per defintion.
Except for these cosmetic details the patch looks fine to me,
thanks a lot!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-10 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-10 14:11 [patchset 0/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:21 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi_error: code cleanup before refactoring of scsi_send_eh_cmnd() Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 15:12 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-09-10 15:19 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-09-10 14:25 ` [PATCH 3/5] usb: transport.c use scsi_eh API in REQUEST_SENSE execution Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:25 ` [PATCH 4/5] NCR5380: Use scsi_eh API for REQUEST_SENSE invocation Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 14:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm: fas216 " Boaz Harrosh
2007-09-10 15:58 ` [patchset 0/5] Refactoring scsi_error to facilitate in synchronous REQUEST_SENSE Alan Stern
2007-09-10 17:03 ` Matthew Dharm
2007-09-10 17:09 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070910151258.GA16802@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdharm-usb@one-eyed-alien.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.