From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:53:34 +0530 Message-ID: <20070910172334.GB19100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20070910171049.GA16048@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: ckrm-tech-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org, Ingo Molnar , akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr) > >+#endif > > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller? *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO! Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is. -- Regards, vatsa From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760948AbXIJRNQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:13:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758954AbXIJRNE (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:13:04 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:43724 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759121AbXIJRNC (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 13:13:02 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:53:34 +0530 From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri To: Jan Engelhardt Cc: Ingo Molnar , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure Message-ID: <20070910172334.GB19100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20070910171049.GA16048@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 07:05:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Sep 10 2007 22:40, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > >+#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED > >+SUBSYS(cpuctlr) > >+#endif > > cpuctl, cpuctrl, cpu_controller? *shrug* .. I used "cpuctlr" to mean "CPU Controller". Any other short names would do. From your list, cpuctl or cpuctrl both qualifies IMO! Unless folks have strong objection to it, I prefer "cptctlr", the way it is. -- Regards, vatsa