From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760117AbXIJTVe (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:21:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756387AbXIJTV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:21:26 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.183]:62390 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755900AbXIJTV0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2007 15:21:26 -0400 Message-Id: <20070910191324.847651727@arndb.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.46-1 Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:13:24 +0200 From: arnd@arndb.de To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , David Miller Subject: [patch 0/3] futex_compat fixes X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18UmFX956R0DAzwUZImI4Xr9UFdZMl+265jEH+ pYcCUtU9o9LqJjLDF7lgwRkTjCR1XvG83+/cuu2eKGoMdv1//o mGWaEAcActvW77cJtd6nQ== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org After looking at the futex_compat code some more, this is what I ended up with. Please look closely at the changes, as I have not actually tested them, being on a 32 bit machine at the moment. I'd suggest merging the first patch in 2.6.23 instead of the original one from David Miller, and the other two for 2.6.24. Arnd <>< --