From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sukadev-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: pid namespace .text overhead Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 19:04:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20070911020406.GA31721@us.ibm.com> References: <46E59D2B.7030609@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46E59D2B.7030609-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Cedric Le Goater Cc: Linux Containers List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Cedric Le Goater [clg-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org] wrote: | FYI, | | I just did a compile test on a 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 kernel with and without | the following patches on a x86_64 defconfig (I also had to remove | CONFIG_IPV6 for some compile reason) : Thats a good point. We have been a bit liberal with "inline" given that lot of the code was going to affect the "fast-path" clone(). Should we shoot for a time/space trade-off or can we make some inlines conditional (i.e inline when not configured for say embedded linux) ? Suka