From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1IV9Qi-0004n3-F8 for kexec@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:21:44 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:21:37 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line Message-ID: <20070911172137.GF20907@suse.de> References: <20070909083914.065380136@strauss.suse.de> <20070909083914.488571169@strauss.suse.de> <20070911131445.GA17460@suse.de> <20070911153209.GA5054@nlxdcldnl2.cl.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070911153209.GA5054@nlxdcldnl2.cl.intel.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: kexec-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: kexec-bounces+dwmw2=infradead.org+dwmw2=infradead.org@lists.infradead.org To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org * Lombard, David N [2007-09-11 17:32]: > > lilo: > append= > > Appends the options specified to the parameter line passed to > the kernel. Given that lilo appends the user-specified command line, I think it's the best to honor the last value. It has also been the previous behaviour (execpt IA64). Having a different behaviour if the last or the first value is honored on different architectures is not what we want, IMO. Thanks, Bernhard _______________________________________________ kexec mailing list kexec@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:33846 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759306AbXIKRVi (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:21:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:21:37 +0200 From: Bernhard Walle Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] Extended crashkernel command line Message-ID: <20070911172137.GF20907@suse.de> References: <20070909083914.065380136@strauss.suse.de> <20070909083914.488571169@strauss.suse.de> <20070911131445.GA17460@suse.de> <20070911153209.GA5054@nlxdcldnl2.cl.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070911153209.GA5054@nlxdcldnl2.cl.intel.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org To: kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Lombard, David N [2007-09-11 17:32]: > > lilo: > append= > > Appends the options specified to the parameter line passed to > the kernel. Given that lilo appends the user-specified command line, I think it's the best to honor the last value. It has also been the previous behaviour (execpt IA64). Having a different behaviour if the last or the first value is honored on different architectures is not what we want, IMO. Thanks, Bernhard