All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] ssb: Make pcmciahost depend on PCMCIA=y
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:09:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709121209.10068.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070912021100.GB26827@linux-sh.org>

On Wednesday 12 September 2007 04:11:00 Paul Mundt wrote:
> SSB uses a bool (SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE) to determine whether to
> build in PCMCIA support or not, as the PCMCIA host code itself is
> also only a bool, make SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE depend on PCMCIA=y.
> 
> Without this, SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE evaluates to y when PCMCIA
> is built as a module, which results in link errors due to the
> pcmcia_access_configuration_register() accesses, where the symbol
> is only defined in a module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
> 
> --
> 
>  drivers/ssb/Kconfig |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1.orig/drivers/ssb/Kconfig	2007-09-11 15:15:52.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc4-mm1/drivers/ssb/Kconfig	2007-09-12 10:51:53.000000000 +0900
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
>  
>  config SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE
>  	bool
> -	depends on SSB && PCMCIA && EXPERIMENTAL
> +	depends on SSB && PCMCIA=y && EXPERIMENTAL
>  	default y
>  
>  config SSB_PCMCIAHOST
> 
> 

There we go. The usual SELECT dependency hell again...
Would changing SSB_PCMCIAHOST_POSSIBLE to tristate also fix it?
What would be the sideeffects?

I think this PCMCIA=y is not good, because it's perfectly
legal to build PCMCIA as module, while SSB and everything
that depends on SSB is also a module.
Would tristate fix that?

-- 
Greetings Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-12 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-12  2:11 [PATCH -mm] ssb: Make pcmciahost depend on PCMCIA=y Paul Mundt
2007-09-12 10:09 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-09-12 10:17   ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-12 10:59     ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-13  1:43       ` Paul Mundt
2007-09-20 19:42         ` Joseph Fannin
2007-09-20 20:33           ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200709121209.10068.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.