Re: Question about svc_age_temp_sockets

[Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>]

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 10:33:13AM +0200, Wolfgang Walter wrote:
> > I'm confused about how svc_age_temp_sockets is supposed to work.
> > [...]
> 
> Hmm, I think it works like that:
> 
> 		if (!test_and_set_bit(SK_OLD, &svsk->sk_flags))
>                         continue;
> 
> So: if SK_OLD is NOT already set then
> 		
> 		  !test_and_set_bit(SK_OLD, &svsk->sk_flags)
> 
> is true and therefor continue is executed (so the transport is not closed,
> only SK_OLD is set).
> 
> If SK_OLD is already set then this evaluates to false and the transport is 
> removed. This means that SK_OLD was set when the timer run the last time and 
> there was no request has arrived since then.

That's right, it's mark-and-sweep.  The SK_OLD bit indicates
"no requests have been received since the last ageing timer".
If it's seen in the next ageing timer, then the socket had been
idle for between 1 and 2 timer periods and thus may be shut down.

Greg
-- 
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
Apparently, I'm Bedevere.  Which MPHG character are you?
I don't speak for SGI.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs