From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] Hookup group-scheduler with task container infrastructure Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:41:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20070914094158.GA1990@elte.hu> References: <20070910172334.GB19100@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070910102259.dc45a481.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070910174649.GA16222@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070911044145.GC16222@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070912114202.GA30385@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20070913123324.GA6214@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070913123324.GA6214@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: Dmitry Adamushko , Andrew Morton , ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, Jan Engelhardt , dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, menage@google.com List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org * Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > Add interface to control cpu bandwidth allocation to task-groups. btw., just in case it was not obvious, i'll repeat my older assessment of your patch: the general picture approach looks good to me and the code is upstream-worthy. ( suggestion: if you want more people to test it then you might want to do some add-on "put all users into separate groups" patch and .config option - which could be tried without people having to know anything about container setup. ) Ingo