From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de
Cc: Larry Finger <larry.finger@lwfinger.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix machine check errors for PPC architecture with BCM4306/2
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:10:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200709152010.07647.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46EC1F5A.7030800@lwfinger.net>
On Saturday 15 September 2007 20:07:22 Larry Finger wrote:
> Your comments may be correct; however, the fact remains that with a rev 4 BCM4306, the original code
> generates many, many machine checks on PPC architecture, and I get reads with all ones on i386
> indicating that the read is invalid. These all occur before the firmware is loaded. Making the
> "gmode" bit mimic the behavior of the phy_connected variable of bcm43xx gets rid of the problems on
> both platforms.
Sure. But if you workaround this like that, you could
as well get completely rid of the gmode bit, as you always force it on.
But I think that's not what we want. The real fix is simple. See below.
> The registers that error are not just the extended GPHY registers that caused
> problems in the past, but all the PHY registers.
Nobody is talking about the extG registers.
> If you can suggest a reordering of the initialization that delays PHY setup until the "magic step"
> that eliminates this problem is done on/to the ssb backplane, I will be happy to test it. I was
> unable to find such a solution.
There is no reordering needed.
You just need to find out why phy->gmode was not set.
I think it's set based on the have_gphy and have_bphy bits.
So you need to look there why one of these is not set. That is the real
cause of the issue.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-15 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-15 17:39 [PATCH] b43legacy: Fix machine check errors for PPC architecture with BCM4306/2 Larry Finger
2007-09-15 17:48 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 18:07 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 18:10 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-09-15 19:12 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 19:47 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 21:01 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 21:58 ` Michael Buesch
2007-09-15 23:26 ` Larry Finger
2007-09-15 23:58 ` Michael Buesch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200709152010.07647.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
--cc=larry.finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.